Famous &
People's Favorite comedians of all time!!
Ever since I was able to look at the
TV screens, the very first options that came into my mind to watch were
cartoons and comedies. People usually tend to look for these jokes and humors
as they are such powerful tools that aid our stress throughout the day, bring
up the laughter to light up, or even they were very entertaining things to watch
as a kid like me who wasn't able to understand what was the concept of the
movie, the dialogues or even what was going on with these characters back then.
Two riots, very amusing and the most popular of all time towards millions of
people were Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton. Although they were very much
similar towards each other as in comedians and the objectives to convey the
humors to the audience, there were spectacular differences that made them very
unique and impressive from the various aspects of cinematography.
1) Charlie Chaplin (1889-1997)
Attributes of Persona: Chaplin reminds me of my childhood clowns, or
jokers whenever I see his funny images, something like this. His rounded hat,
thick make up, shadowed and liner-ed eyes, and very obvious thick mustache are
such clown's features that would already appeal us to look and smile at. What
added more is his outfit; the small coat, and big loosing pants, the walking
stick and big elf shoes! We can see that Chaplin tried his every best to make
his movies hilarious especially from his exclusive look, which was alone
amusing, apart from his actions and roles. Charlie indeed made himself the
subject of the movies.
Facial & Body gestures: Referring to the movie 'The
Cure' that I've watched in Mr. Rey's film class, Chaplin used
the exaggerated facial expressions that a comedian could not easily
possess. The time when he mistakenly thought he was being flirted by the giant
man, he showed his shyness, flirty face, his squeezed shoulders, twisted legs
and overall he became a 'female'. He imitated how a real lady would react to
this flattering situation that he did express through his face.
However, rarely we could see the close-up shots of his face like this,
throughout the movie. His far utmost feature was his marvelous body
movement especially his duck-like walking which was found out to be quite
funny. Moreover, Chaplin used a lot more spaces than any other comedians as his
stage for running, falling down, tripping off, jumping and all kinds of bodily
movement. Giving an example, the time when he entered the spa as an alcoholic
gentleman, we started laughing from the moment he got out from the cart and
walked drastically towards the mineral well and fell into it. He was such out
of control, which drew our full attention. Later that, the problem started as
he tried to enter through the spinning door of the spa and he hurt the giant
patient's bandaged foot which eventually broke our silence in the class with laughter
seeing that Chaplin had brought all the mess. It is indeed true that we find it
very humorous when someone got hurt but not died, though I don't really know
the reason why but Chaplin just grabbed that moment.
Challenges and Situations: When the time comes to encounter
the climax of the situation in a story, they are mainly the conflicts or the
challenges. The first challenge towards Chaplin in this movie would be the time
when he was forced to drink the spring water by the therapist in front of this
one charming girl. Even though he wanted to refuse the offer to drink, he
pretended to be a nice gentleman in front of her
by unknowingly pouring the water out into his hat. Besides, he also
avoided the situation to get massaged by the spa therapist, which was seemed to
be extremely hair-raising thing for Chaplin to go through. He couldn't fight
back, he was such a tiny-boned man who would easily get knocked out by these
gigantic men; but well surely yes, Charlie Chaplin was not the type of person
who would just sit there quietly and follow the rules. He basically made us
(the audience) anticipate how he could finally solve this. Then again, he used
his tremendous and gymnastic movements to smoothly slip out of these dangerous
situations. Chaplin just tried his every way to escape the challenges and
conflicts that would disappoint or piss him off.
Romance: Charlie Chaplin! I would say such a playboy,
filthy rich-gentlemen who could grab a girl's heart so easily in this
character. There were no death-concerning problems to approach the girl he
liked and finally he was able to be her side just by standing out to be a
hero-guy amongst the whole bunch of drunkards. All out of luck and ease, he met
the girl, lost her for a moment when she didn't know the well was full of
alcohol, and finally got the girl just in a short time.
2) Buster Keaton (1895-1966)
Attributes of Persona: In contrast to Charlie Chaplin, however, Keaton wore
much simpler, more normal persona that everyone else would be wearing which
would obviously not identify Buster Keaton as a comedian. I realized him
wearing no smiles but just had a serious face throughout his movies and thus,
his fans eventually nicknamed him as 'The Great Stone Face" for his
deadpan expressions. He didn't wear any funny make-ups, or comical suits that
would address him as a comedian like Chaplin, yet he was no less famous than
Chaplin either, throughout that era. Keaton mostly played well-meaning looks,
slightly foolish regular guy, with or without the mercy of his girlfriends or
families but the one who triumphs in the end despite the odds.
Facial & Body
gestures: To be honest, the movie called "The General" that I
have watched in previous film class was the only, and my favorite comic movie
acted by Keaton. Throughout this movie, we could rarely see Keaton change his
facial expressions but maintained his meaningful stone face most of the time.
In particular, the time when Keaton showed his only two loves in the world; the
girl and the engine, his face illustrated how seriously he had felt towards
them. Moreover, when he got rejected to be in an army, his face demonstrated
how desolate and hopeless type of person he thought he was. For he, who wanted
to prove that he was a brave and honorable man in front of the girl's family,
finally was hurt with this rejection. Besides these stunning facial
expressions, his stunts were also part of the most controlling factors to make
this movie eminent. For instance, missing the bombs that were shooting at him
when the train was still moving, secret and sudden fights to the guards at the
enemy's camp, or his funny and smart ideas to delay the enemy's train on their return.
While Chaplin was just roaming around in a very child-like, and carefree
nuisance character in his little own world, Buster Keaton used a lot wider
scene set-ups to create stunts and moves, fights and battles to make the movies
in addition, to be adventurous, dramatic, and action apart from the romance
comedies.
Challenges and
Situations: Before I move on to explain about this climax or the turning
point of the movie, I would like to write about the most essential period (the
build up) for Keaton, which was the time when 'The General' train was stolen.
It wasn't very long after Keaton got very disappointed with the army
rejection and in a state of melancholy. Again, he was a small young man, just
like Charlie Chaplin. He had no strength to fight back these enemies of other
state to take back the train. Did he also try to escape? No! He obviously
wasn't prepared to face with this challenge but yet, he decided to get involved
as this engine was his only love left after the girl neglected him for he
couldn't join the army. He realized he was alone following the enemies though
he wasn't scared to take the train back no matter how many people were on the
enemy's side. I would say, Buster Keaton was a very strong and brave person when
the time came to encounter the big problems and he's someone whom a girl can really rely on. Even so, the girl who got kidnapped through the train robbery still
had not known about 'brave' Keaton. He still needed to prove that he was a grown
up, matured strong man to her and that was the climax plot. The close-up shot
of her face, seen through a small hole then had encouraged Keaton who was
hiding under the table in doubt to make strong decisions. In the end, he
accepted the challenge, settled the conflict by defeating the enemy's army, and
brought the honor and success. (It was such a happy ending).
Romance: Very much unlike
Charlie Chaplin who got the girl so easily, Buster Keaton had suffered through
a lot more which were near-death-situations. The enemies could catch him at
that night when he was hiding under the table. Or at most, he could just avoid saving
the train to save himself. But Keaton who was kind of honorable and love-able
with respect person did not. He tried his every way of chances with his smart
ideas without even hesitation. Thus, he finally got his lovely girl, his train,
and what more, a general position in the army! What an honor!
Differences
& Similarities
When it comes to talk about these distinctive factors of these
two different movies, roles and characters, situations and climax were totally different,
as I have mentioned throughout this page. The movie, 'The Cure' is such comedic
and hilarious because we can see Charlie Chaplin in here who is alone funny.
Everything that Chaplin did in this movie was funny and how things got messed
up since he entered the scene, too. Where else in 'The General', Buster Keaton
took "funny" to the situations he met throughout the journey, to the
ways that he encountered with them, to the things that were unexpected.
Nevertheless, as I have once stated in my introduction, they both were very
famous and talented for they had made millions of people to laugh and enjoy
throughout the world. They both were not masculine types that most of the
ladies' dreaming princes would be, but yet, they both were loved by so many
fans, including men, women and kids. They both were small but they did rule the
world.
My
Pick Up
Both Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton were truly
great actors that I have found out in the centuries' comedies. Charlie was
always one of my favorite childhood actors and until now that even I was so
crazy I bought his poster once that I stuck on my dorm's door. As I have said
earlier, I have only watched one movie about Buster Keaton and that was this
"The General." Compared to that, I have watched tens of Charlie's
movies and he was such a favorite idol to me. However to be honest, when I
compared these two characters but not the persons, I preferred Buster Keaton in
a sense, Keaton acted out in more a realistic way and he got these inspiring
quick ideas to make decisions which got my nerves on where Charlie was just an
old amusing clown. I am not sure I might change my pick up if I have also
watched so many of Keaton's. But just these, just for now, just with these
movies, I love Buster Keaton more!
=)
Good work. Your essay does establish the differences between both personae quite well -- and you do link to specifics from the films. The quality of your writing is still weak, however. You repeat a lot and don't practice economy. You need to learn to trim your writing
ReplyDelete7/8